• Football
• Leagues
• Latvia
• Virsliga
• Rigas Futbola Skola x Jelgava

Rigas Futbola Skola - Jelgava 21.05.2026

• 21/05/26 13:00 |
  Round 14
• Rigas Futbola Skola

  Lemajic D. - 27', 47'

  Prenga H. - 57'

  Gaye M. - 75'
  • 4 : 0
  • Finished
  Jelgava

Summary Player Statistics

RFS

Match details

JEL

1st Half 1:0

27 Lemajic D.

2nd Half 3:0

47 Lemajic D.

57 Prenga H.

75 Gaye M.

RFS

Statistics

JEL

2.21

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.31

69 %

Ball possession

31 %

5

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

10 Matches

7 - Wins

2 - Draws

1 - Losses

10 Matches

9 - Wins

1 - Draws

0 - Losses

10 Matches

8 - Wins

1 - Draws

1 - Losses

10 Matches

Wins - 2

Draws - 3

Losses - 5

10 Matches

Wins - 1

Draws - 6

Losses - 3

10 Matches

Wins - 2

Draws - 3

Losses - 5

• 10% 1/10
• Both team to score
• 2/10 20%

• 64%
• Ball possession
• 39%

• 22 2.2
• Goals scored per match
• 7 0.7

• 14.6 1.46
• xG (Expected Goals) per match
• 4.14 0.41

• 8 0.8
• Goals conceded per match
• 21 2.1

• 3.46 0.35
• Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
• 14.13 1.41

Full Stats

RFS

H2H Stats

JEL

All tournaments Virsliga Latvijas Kauss Club Friendly Games 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 5 matches

• 80% 4wins
• 0draws
• 20% 1wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

Rigas Futbola Skola

Latvia Virsliga

#

Goals

• 10 Ikaunieks J.
  5
• 26 Panic S.
  5
• 22 Lemajic D.
  5
• 43 Lipuscek Z.
  2
• 7 Diomande I.
  2

Jelgava

Latvia Virsliga

#

Goals

• 32 Hasek F.
  4
• Kacanovs G.
  1
• 11 Rataj T.
  1
• 21 Melkis R.
  1
• Kangars A.
  1

Show full top scorers

Match facts

The most common result of matches between FC RFS and FS Jelgava when FC RFS is playing at home is 1-0. 7 matches have ended with this result.

The most common result of matches between FC RFS and FS Jelgava is 1-0. 11 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 17 meetings with FC RFS playing at home, FC RFS have won 15 times, there have been 0 draws while FS Jelgava have won 2 times. The goal difference is 38-7 in favour of FC RFS.

During the last 37 meetings, FC RFS have won 27 times, there have been 5 draws while FS Jelgava have won 5 times. The goal difference is 70-22 in favour of FC RFS.

FC RFS have a winning streak of 4 matches in Virsliga.

Did you know that FC RFS scores 19% of their goals between the minutes 61-75?

FC RFS have a winning streak of 4 matches.

FC RFS haven't lost in their last 9 games.

FC RFS haven't scored in 1 of their 6 home matches in Virsliga this season.

FS Jelgava haven't scored in 3 of their 7 away matches in Virsliga this season.

FC RFS have scored at least one goal for 9 consecutive matches.

FC RFS wins 1st half in 44% of their matches, FS Jelgava in 18% of their matches.

FC RFS wins 44% of halftimes, FS Jelgava wins 18%.

The winner of their last meeting was FC RFS.

On their last meeting FC RFS won by 1 goals.

When FC RFS leads 1-0 at home, they win in 93% of their matches.

When FS Jelgava leads 0-1 away, they win in 25% of their matches.

When FC RFS is down 0-1 home, they win 16% of their matches.

When FS Jelgava is down 1-0 away, they win 0% of their matches.

In Virsliga, FC RFS has better performance than FS Jelgava.

FC RFS's performance of the last 5 matches is better than FS Jelgava's.

FC RFS have lost just 1 of their last 5 games against FS Jelgava (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings FC RFS won 3, FS Jelgava won 1, 1 draws.

FC RFS have lost just 1 of their last 5 Virsliga games against FS Jelgava.

FS Jelgava have won just 1 of their last 5 Virsliga games against FC RFS.

FC RFS scores 1.2 goals in a match against FS Jelgava and FS Jelgava scores 1.2 goals against FC RFS (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between FC RFS and FS Jelgava is 2.4.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between FC RFS and FS Jelgava is 0.8.

Both teams didn't concede on their last match.

FC RFS scores 2.65 goals when playing at home and FS Jelgava scores 0.9 goals when playing away (on average).

Did you know that FC RFS scores 19% of their goals between the minutes 61-75? This is the highest percentage in the league.

Did you know that FS Jelgava scores 40% of their goals between the minutes 0-15?

FC RFS have kept a clean sheet in 3 matches in a row.

More facts

Who will win?

• Rigas Futbola Skola
• Draw
• Jelgava

Vote and compare your choice with other fans!

Will both teams score?

• Yes
• No

Vote and compare your choice with other fans!

Who will score first?

• Rigas Futbola Skola
• No goal
• Jelgava

Vote and compare your choice with other fans!

Predictions

As part of the Virsliga (Latvia) tournament, the match between teams Rigas Futbola Skola and Jelgava is scheduled. The game will start on 21.05 at 13:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Rigas Futbola Skola Jelgava betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

8 / 10 of last matches Rigas Futbola Skola in all tournaments ended with her victory

8 / 10 of last matches Rigas Futbola Skola in Virsliga ended with her victory

8 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Rigas Futbola Skola

5 / 10 of her last matches Jelgava in all competitions ended in defeat

5 / 10 of last matches Jelgava in Virsliga ended in defeat

9 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Rigas Futbola Skola did not draw

More predictions

RFS

Standings

JEL

Latvia Virsliga

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Rigas Futbola Skola	16	14	1	1	38:11	27	43
2	Riga FC	16	12	3	1	50:17	33	39
6	BFC Daugavpils	16	5	3	8	19:24	-5	18
7	Jelgava	16	3	6	7	12:30	-18	15
8	Tukums 2000	16	2	7	7	29:30	-1	13

Full Standings

Player Statistics

Overall Rigas Futbola Skola Jelgava

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Savalnieks R. Midfielder	8.7	80	-	-	1	0.88	-	41/46(89%)	-	-
Melkis R. Defender	6.4	21	-	-	-	-	-	4/7(57%)	-	-
Dusalijevs N. Midfielder	-	10	-	-	-	-	-	6/9(67%)	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	-	10	-	-	-	-	-	4/4(100%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Dusalijevs N. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Melkis R. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Savalnieks R. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Dusalijevs N. Midfielder	-	6/9(67%)	-	-	-	-	1/2(50%)	11	-	-	-	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	-	4/4(100%)	-	-	-	-	1/1(100%)	7	-	-	-	-	-
Melkis R. Defender	-	4/7(57%)	-	-	-	-	2/3(67%)	11	-	-	-	-	-
Savalnieks R. Midfielder	-	41/46(89%)	1	-	1	0.88	20/22(91%)	74	-	6/15(40%)	-	1	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Savalnieks R. Midfielder	4	2/2(100%)	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	2	-	1/2(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Melkis R. Defender	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Dusalijevs N. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.